<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Principles of a liberal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sleptlate.org/2009/08/16/principles-of-a-liberal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sleptlate.org/2009/08/16/principles-of-a-liberal/</link>
	<description>One free adverb with every purchase!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.sleptlate.org/2009/08/16/principles-of-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sleptlate.org/?p=108#comment-75</guid>
		<description>&quot;Don&#039;t Think of an Elephant&quot; is the &quot;playbook&quot; that has come out of the much *much* larger body of work. Moral Politics is the thesis behind DTOAE and well worth the time reading it. 2/3 is dedicated to apolitical exploration of the two &quot;sides&quot; moral frameworks that guide them and the last third is really Lakoff&#039;s personal view (as a progressive) about why the conservative framework is flawed and how to &quot;pitch&quot; progressive ideas to the centre :)

Keep up the good work :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t Think of an Elephant&#8221; is the &#8220;playbook&#8221; that has come out of the much *much* larger body of work. Moral Politics is the thesis behind DTOAE and well worth the time reading it. 2/3 is dedicated to apolitical exploration of the two &#8220;sides&#8221; moral frameworks that guide them and the last third is really Lakoff&#8217;s personal view (as a progressive) about why the conservative framework is flawed and how to &#8220;pitch&#8221; progressive ideas to the centre <img src='http://www.sleptlate.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Keep up the good work <img src='http://www.sleptlate.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Musgrave</title>
		<link>http://www.sleptlate.org/2009/08/16/principles-of-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Musgrave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sleptlate.org/?p=108#comment-74</guid>
		<description>All I&#039;ve read of his is Don&#039;t Think of an Elephant.  Thanks for the tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I&#8217;ve read of his is Don&#8217;t Think of an Elephant.  Thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.sleptlate.org/2009/08/16/principles-of-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sleptlate.org/?p=108#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I found your blog via your brother Alex.

I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve read it but if not &quot;Moral Politics: How Conservatives and Liberals Thinkg&quot; by George Lakoff. He further explores the underlying world view that leads Conservatives to build up a &quot;my view is absolute - any challenge to a part is a challenge to the whole&quot; set of values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your blog via your brother Alex.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve read it but if not &#8220;Moral Politics: How Conservatives and Liberals Thinkg&#8221; by George Lakoff. He further explores the underlying world view that leads Conservatives to build up a &#8220;my view is absolute &#8211; any challenge to a part is a challenge to the whole&#8221; set of values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.sleptlate.org/2009/08/16/principles-of-a-liberal/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sleptlate.org/?p=108#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Very well put. But which &quot;natural laws&quot; are supposed to remain fixed over time? I can&#039;t think of a single one. For example:

&lt;b&gt;- 330 BC.&lt;/b&gt; The mass of an object determines its speed in freefall.
&lt;b&gt;- 1600 AD.&lt;/b&gt; The intrinsic &quot;impetus&quot; of an object determines its speed in freefall.
&lt;b&gt;- 1687 AD.&lt;/b&gt; The earth&#039;s gravitational force acting on an object determines its speed in freefall.
&lt;b&gt;- 1916 AD.&lt;/b&gt; The curvature of spacetime around an object determines its speed in freefall.
&lt;b&gt;- 2050 AD.&lt;/b&gt; Quantum gravity...?

Of course, someone might reply that there has been just one &lt;em&gt;correct&lt;/em&gt; natural law all along. In that case, we&#039;re just really, really prone to believing &lt;em&gt;incorrect&lt;/em&gt; laws. Either way, the argument for immutable Republican principles looks grim. I wonder if they sell clothing to emperors, as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well put. But which &#8220;natural laws&#8221; are supposed to remain fixed over time? I can&#8217;t think of a single one. For example:</p>
<p><b>- 330 BC.</b> The mass of an object determines its speed in freefall.<br />
<b>- 1600 AD.</b> The intrinsic &#8220;impetus&#8221; of an object determines its speed in freefall.<br />
<b>- 1687 AD.</b> The earth&#8217;s gravitational force acting on an object determines its speed in freefall.<br />
<b>- 1916 AD.</b> The curvature of spacetime around an object determines its speed in freefall.<br />
<b>- 2050 AD.</b> Quantum gravity&#8230;?</p>
<p>Of course, someone might reply that there has been just one <em>correct</em> natural law all along. In that case, we&#8217;re just really, really prone to believing <em>incorrect</em> laws. Either way, the argument for immutable Republican principles looks grim. I wonder if they sell clothing to emperors, as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

